The use of rasch measurement model for the validity and reliability

Sharifah Nurulhuda Tuan Mohd Yasin(1), Mohd Fauzi Mohd Yunus(2), Izwah Ismail(3),
(1) Politeknik Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia  Malaysia
(2) Politeknik Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia  Malaysia
(3) Politeknik Ungku Omar, Malaysia  Malaysia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/0111

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Development Questionnaire II (Student) is to obtain feedback from respondents, the students associated with the Program Implementation Evaluation Diploma in Mechatronics Engineering at the Polytechnic towards Industrial Requirements in Malaysia. This study was conducted to produce empirical evidence about the validity and reliability of the questionnaire II (Student) using Rasch Measurement Model. A pilot study was conducted at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic Kota Kinabalu, Sabah on 38 students in their final semester of a diploma program in Mechatronic Engineering. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire II (Students) were measured using Rasch Measurement Model Winsteps Version 3.69.1.11. Rasch analysis showed respondents reliability index is 0.97 and reliability index is 0.91.From the point of polarity items, each item can contribute to the measurement because the PTMEA CORR each item above 0.30, which is between 0.30 to 0.81. Appropriateness test shows 23 items in the questionnaire should be dropped and the second item MNSQ repaired because the outfit has to be outside the range between 0.6 to 1.40. These findings provide the dimensions of the construct validity of the questionnaire, which constructs the implementation of the teaching and learning process, use of facilities and equipment for teaching and learning and assessment. Rasch Measurement Model has shown that the questionnaire II (Students) have a high validity and reliability for use in measuring the evaluation of Diploma in Mechatronics Engineering Program implementation at Polytechnic College in regards to the Industrial Requirement in Malaysia.

References


Aiken, S. (2003). Estimation Of Item Parameters. In F. G. H. W. & M. I. (Eds.), Rasch Models, Foudations, Recent Developments And Applications. (p. 39–52.). New-York: Springer-Verlag.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying The Rasch Model : Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. (2nd. Ed. L). London: Mahwah, New Jersey.

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Chua, Y.P. (2006). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. (3rd–70th ed.). Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education.

Gallanger, J. D. (1998). Classroom Assessment For Teacher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill: Prentice Hall.

Gay, D., & Asian, A. (2003). The Rating Scale Model. In van der L. W. J. K. & H. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. (p. 67–84.). New-York: Springer-Verlag.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press.

Linacre, J. M. (2005). A user’s guide and Program Manual to Winstep: Rasch Model Computer Program. (MESA Press., Ed.). Chicago.

Popham, W. J. (1990). Modern Education Measurement: A Practitioner’s Perspective. (W. J. (1990). M. E. M. A. P. P. S. E. B. A. and B. Popham, Ed.) (Second Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic Models For Some Intelligence And Attainment Test. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 924 times
 PDF Downloaded : 286 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.