A New Computer Application for Innovation and Evaluation in Counseling

James Ayers(1), Schmidt William(2), Michael W Ross(3), Bugbee W Thomas(4), Joan Knight(5),
(1) UfaceME, Inc.  United States
(2) UfaceME, Inc.  United States
(3) Department of Family Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School  United States
(4) UfaceME, Inc.  United States
(5) UfaceME, Inc.  United States

Corresponding Author

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/01241

Full Text:    Language : en


To measure the effect of counselling, outcome measures are obtained after completion of a counseling session because measuring outcomes and changes that occur during and within the counseling session itself is problematic. This problem was addressed by a new method demonstrated with medical students.1 Rarely has a counseling session been documented by clients.2 Using the UfaceME® method, Clients or people acting as clients responded to a series of statements which were repeated every four minutes as they watched video-audio replay of their session. They then observed by viewing and rating a comparison of their responses with those of their counselor. This study shows the benefits of the UfaceME method as an application to measure change that occurs within a counseling session. Significant positive changes were demonstrated in clients’ perception and feelings towards the end of the session compared to the beginning. Implications and results to date include further counseling engagement, healthy behavioral and relational change, improved mental health, and improved self-awareness.


counseling feedback, computer application, counselor rating, client rating, interpersonal


Ross MW, Ayers J, Schmidt W, Bugbee TW, Knight J, Muthyala BK, Newstrom NP. A new computer application for teaching sexual history taking to medical students: innovation and evaluation in the UfaceMETM program. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:333-341. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S1954611

Miller SD, Hubble MA, Chow D, Seidel J. (2015). Beyond measures and monitoring: Realizing the potential of feedback-informed treatment. Psychotherapy,

Psychotherapy, 2015, Vol. 52, No. 4, 449–457.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/

Kagan N. (1980). Influencing human interaction - Eighteen years with IPR. In A.K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 262-283). New York: Wiley.

Laing RD, Phillipson H, Lee AR. (1966). Interpersonal perception: a theory and a method of research. London: Harper and Row.

Ayers J. (1980). A preliminary report on the empirical assessment of face-to-face Interaction by means of structured video stimulated recall: The Interpersonal Tracking Task. (unpublished manuscript). Department of Psychology. University of Minnesota).

Ayers J. (2009). Ten reasons why we psychologists don't observe our face-to-face work…and what difference it makes. Minnesota Psychologist, November, 2009.

Kazdin AE. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, pp 146-159.

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 457 times
 PDF Downloaded : 81 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.