Acculturation of sharia and custom in the ban on single organs

Siti Nurhafiza(1), Zufriani Zufriani(2), Maryani Maryani(3),
(1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci  Indonesia
(2) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci  Indonesia
(3) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/017519

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


his study examines how Islamic (sharia) values and local customary law (adat) have come together in the customary prohibition of single-organ (orgen tunggal) entertainment in Koto Petai Village, Kerinci Regency, Jambi. Orgen tunggal refers to solo electronic-keyboard performances that are inexpensive to stage and, in this community, are associated with late-night crowds, alcohol, and brawls. Customary leaders (ninik mamak) have enforced the ban since 2003. Rather than asking whether the prohibition is justified, the study asks how villagers understand, justify, comply with, and at times question it, and what the case reveals about the workings of communal customary law. The research used a qualitative case study with a phenomenological orientation. Data were generated through in-depth semi-structured interviews with purposively selected participants customary leaders, a religious leader, a village official, and ordinary villagers alongside non-participant observation and review of relevant local materials during 2024. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically with the support of NVivo 12, and trustworthiness was strengthened through source and method triangulation, member checking, and an audit trail. Five themes were constructed: a religious moral order as the ground of the ban; the fusion of sharia and adat into a single unwritten norm; customary social control through deliberation (musyawarah) and graduated sanctions; broad compliance accompanied by quieter negotiation and differing views; and communal customary law as a living, binding order. The case suggests that acculturation here is less a finished state of harmony than an ongoing negotiation in which religious and customary authority reinforce one another while still leaving room for differing community voices.

Keywords


Customary social control, Islam adat acculturation communal customary law, Moral regulation, Orgen tunggal (single-organ entertainment), Qualitative case study

References


Afdal, A. (2023). Strategi komunikasi ninik mamak kepada anak kemenakan terhadap larangan pelaksanaan orgen tunggal di Nagari Lubuk Malako, Kabupaten Solok Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(1).

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Geertz, C. (1960). The religion of Java. Free Press.

Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Lundeto, N., Ni’am, S., & Naim, N. (2023). Islam Nusantara perspektif KH. Abdurrahman Wahid dan implikasinya dalam mewujudkan keberagamaan inklusif di Gorontalo. Perada, 6(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.35961/perada.v6i2.976

Murni, S., & Elimartati. (2021). Implementasi Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Padang Pariaman Nomor 11 Tahun 2018 tentang ketenteraman dan ketertiban umum perspektif siyasah dusturiyah (Studi kasus orgen tunggal di Nagari Kasang). JISRAH: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah, 2(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v2i1.2870

Nasution, I., & Hasibuan, N. H. (2023). Akulturasi hukum Islam dan kearifan lokal: Kajian pergeseran tradisi sanksi hukum adat kawin semarga masyarakat Batak Angkola. Jurnal Hukum dan Kearifan Lokal, (2), 4–9.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Pound, R. (1942). Social control through law. Yale University Press.

Pratiwi, D. (2020). Pertunjukan organ tunggal pada acara pernikahan di Kelurahan Indralaya Mulya, Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Jurnal Seni dan Budaya, 83–92.

Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.

Salim, H. M. (2016). Adat sebagai budaya kearifan lokal untuk memperkuat eksistensi adat ke depan. Jurnal Al-Daulah, 5(2), 244–255.

Soepomo, R. (2003). Bab-bab tentang hukum adat. Pradnya Paramita.

Ter Haar, B. (1948). Adat law in Indonesia (E. A. Hoebel & A. A. Schiller, Eds. & Trans.). Institute of Pacific Relations.

Ulum, A. B. (2020). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap hiburan orgen tunggal dalam pesta perkawinan (Studi kasus di Kelurahan Iringmulyo, Kecamatan Metro Timur). Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 12–13.

Umiyati. (2021). Tinjauan maslahah terhadap hiburan orgen dalam resepsi pernikahan di Desa Topang, Kecamatan Rangsang, Kabupaten Meranti, Kepulauan Riau. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4(1), 6.

Van Vollenhoven, C. (1981). Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian adat law (J. F. Holleman, Ed.). Martinus Nijhoff.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 8 times
 PDF Downloaded : 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.